Ara

Bu bölümde sistem içerisindeki makaleler arasında arama yapabilirsiniz.

Dergi Kimliği

Online ISSN (İngilizce)
1305-3124

Basılı ISSN (Türkçe)
1300-5251

Online ISSN (Türkçe)
1305-3132

Kuruluş
1993

Editör
Cihat Şen

Yardımcı Editörler
Murat Yayla, Oluş Api

The effects of art on mz twinning: Micromanipulation & the risk of multiplepregnancy

Ramón Aurell, Itziar Belil, Anna Veiga, Pedro N. Barri

Künye

The effects of art on mz twinning: Micromanipulation & the risk of multiplepregnancy. Perinatoloji Dergisi 2005;13(2):s79-85

Yazar Bilgileri

Ramón Aurell,
Itziar Belil,
Anna Veiga,
Pedro N. Barri

  1. Obstetric, Gynecology & Reproductive Medicine Services. Institut Universitari Dexeus- Barcelona ES
Yazışma Adresi

Ramón Aurell, Obstetric, Gynecology & Reproductive Medicine Services. Institut Universitari Dexeus- Barcelona ES,

Yayın Geçmişi

Yayınlanma Tarihi: 01 Nisan 2005

Çıkar Çakışması

Çıkar çakışması bulunmadığı belirtilmiştir.

Giriş
In the past 20 years micromanipulation has become an important aspect of all human assisted reproduction programmes with the goal to improve fertility treatment results and overcome male infertility. The commonestmicromanipulation techniques used are:
Intracytoplasmatic Sperm Injection (ICSI) for the treatment of male infertility.
Cytoplasmic transfer to investigate and improve embryo development, Assisted Hatching (AH), procedure usedto make a "hole " in the Zona Pellucida to facilitate implantation of the embryo in the endometrium,Blastomere biopsy for the diagnosis of genetic disease and aneuploidy, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis(PGD). The use of those techniques has been associated with an increase in Monozygotic Twins.

Micromanipulation Techniques
Of all micromanipulation techniques, Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), Assisted Hatching and Embryobiopsy for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) most commonly are responsible for the increased incidence in Monozygotic (MZ) twins and multiple pregnancies in vitro fertilization cycles (IVF). All are usedin efforts to increase fertilization rates in partners with low sperm counts, to increase rates of endometrialimplantation, and to provide preimplantation genetic information. Studies in animal models suggest that MZ twinning can be induced through ovum or embryo "manipulation", either mechanical or chemical. In particularzona manipulation in placental animals appears to increase monoamniotic twinning(1).
Although the mechanisms by which MZ twins are formed is not completely known, many investigators postulate that the splitting of the inner cell mass at an early stage of development may cause the duplication of the embryo(1).Splitting of the zygote may occur at any time during the first (2) weeks after fertilization, resulting in the various forms of MZ twinning. When division of the embryonic cell mass occurs earlier than 72 hours after fertilization, diamniotic dichorionic MZ twins will evolve. Division after the inner cell mass hasformed, between day 4 and day 8, gives rise to diamniotic monochorionic twins. Splitting after day 8 willlead tomonochorionic monoamniotic twins. This process probably begins with the protrusion of sometropho-ectoderm cells through a small opening in the zona pellucida.
Factors that appear to predispose to this splitting include alterations in the thickness of the zona pellucida, timeof implantation, and the assisted reproductive techniques. In particular micromanipulation of zona pellucida in ART (Subzonal insemination, ICSI and Assisted hatching) increases the frequency of twins and monozygotic twins(1).The artificial opening introduced in the zona pellucida caused may alter the process of hatching, in thatthe expansion during the expulsion of the blastocyst through the artificial opening may cause constriction andbisection of the trophoblast and inner cell mass, which results in twinning. Multiple gaps in the zona pellucidamay even lead to multiple herniations, possibly contributing to higher-order monozygotic pregnancies(6).

Intracytoplasmatic Sperm Injection (ICSI)
Spermatozoa sometimes fail to fertilize an egg during conventional IVF. Failure in IVF are particularly common in the presence of grossly abnormal semen parameters or when the number of spermatozoa is insufficient. In majority of the instances gamete micromanipulation is the onlyway to overcome this problem. Initially techniques focused on the obstacle to sperm penetration, the zona pellucida (ZP), by thinning it through exposure to enzymes or creating an opening through localized chemical digestion, mechanical breach, or even photoablation. Although associated with a fertilization rate of 20%, these techniques have been abandoned dueto the requirement for numerous functional spermatozoa with good progressive motility and complications suchas multiple sperm penetration.
ICSI, on the other hand entails the deposition of a single spermatozoa directly within the cytoplasm of theoocyte, and bypassing the ZP and the oolemma. The ability of ICSI to achieve higher fertilization and pregnancy rates regardless of the sperm characteristics makes it the most powerful micromanipulation procedure as yet to treat male factor infertility. In fact, the therapeutic possibilities of ICSI range from instances in which, aftersperm selection, the spermatozoa show poor progressive motility, to application in azoospermic men where spermatozoa are surgically retrieved from the epididymis and the testis. ICSI is also useful when specificoocytes are considered for PGD. As removal of the polar body requires the stripping of cumulus corona cells,ICSI is the only option to avoid polyspermy.
Three types of micromanipulation procedures were developed to improve fertilization rates, in those cases with associated male factor sterility in ART programmes. The first procedure involved the creation of an artificial gap in the zona pellucida, either by manually dissecting a hole using needles or by using a chemicalagent to "burn" a hole in the zona. This procedure was described as Partial Zona drilling (PZD). The secondwas a more invasive procedure that totally bypassed the zona by depositing spermatozoa directly into the perivitelline space, the so-called Subzonal insemination (SUZI). The third step was the direct injection of a single spermatozoon into the ooplasm of the oocyte (ICSI)(1).The first ICSI pregnancy was created in 1992 (byPalermo) after a human spermatozoon was accidentally injected into the ooplasm of a human oocyte during a SUZI procedure(16).Initially, this technique only led to a limited improvement of the fertilization rates comparedto SUZI(2).As of the present writing time the incidence of congenital malformation in babies born after ICSI isnot higher than in the general population, but patients should be counselled about the higher risk of transmitted chromosomal aberrations, of sex chromosomal aberrations, and the risk of transmitting fertility problems to theoffspring(3).
Much has been written about ICSI and the increased incidence of twins, specially MZ twins. Tarlatzis et al,(4)recently published a study comparing conventional IVF- blastocyst transferred cycles with ICSI-blastocysttransferred cycles. The overall incidence of MZ was 3.3% per cycle (in both groups), however statistically significant increase in the rates of MP( 10,8% vs 2.6%) and MZ ( 5.9% vs 0%) was observed in the ICSI groupcompared with the conventional IVF group respectively.
Abusheika et al,(5)reported an incidence of 8.9% of MZ twins subsequent to ICSI compared with 0.9% afterconventional IVF. The effect of zona pellucida manipulation on MZ twins was also confirmed in another studythat showed significant increase in the MZ twins after mechanical assisted hatching (1.2%) as compared withnon hatching (0%)(6).These findings are probably due to the artificial opening created by mechanical trauma,assisted hatching or ICSI, rather than natural autolysis of the zona which is responsible for splitting of the innercell mass, as there were no cases of MZT in the nonmanipulated zona pellucida.
A.L.E da Costa, et al (7) reported that during 1996 to 1999, 6 out of 814 (0.7%) MZ pregnancies occured afterICSI and transfer of 2 to 8 cell stage embryos. From that time these investigators introduced day 5 transfer inSeptember 1998 until September 1999, 5 out 129 (3.9%) pregnancies resulting from ICSI and blastocyst stageembryo transfers were complicated by MZ twinning. The increased incidence was statistically significant:x2 = 7.33785 with Yates correction ; odds ratio = 5.606; P= 0.00675. Age and cycle outcome are shown in Table I by A.L.E. da Costa et al.7No differences in age or number of oocytes recovered were observed, however the mean number of embryos transferred was lower and theimplantation rate higher in day 5 transfer

.Assisted Hatching (AH)
The main function of the ZP after fertilization is the protection of the embryo and the maintenance of itsintegrity. It is postulated that the blastomeric cells are only weakly connected and that the ZP is needed duringthe migration of the embryo through the reproductive tract to maintain its physical integrity. Implantation has been observed after replacement of zona free morulas or blastocysts, whereas the transfer of zona free precompacted embryos results in the inadherence to the oviductal walls or to one another. A possible protectiverole against hostile uterine factors has also been described. The first report on the use of AH in human embryoswas published by Cohen et al in 1990(8).These authors reported an important increase of implantation rates withmechanical AH in embryos from unselected IVF patients.
The mechanism by which AH promotes embryo implantation remains unclear.As the implantation window represents the critical period when the endometrium reaches its ideal receptive state for implantation, a precisesynchronization between the embryo and the endometrium is essential. In a randomised study, Liu et al demonstrated that implantation occurred significantly earlier in patients whose embryos were submitted to AH compared to the control group, possibly by allowing earlier embryo endometrium contact(9).Furthermore,although most molecules are able to cross the ZP, the rate of transport may be related to zona thickness. Thepresence of an artificial gap may alter the two-way transport of metabolites and growth factors across the ZP,permiting earlier exposure of the embryo to vital growth factors. In addition to facilitating embryonic hatching,it has been postulated that AH allows earlier hatching, therefor aiding earlier embryo-endometrium contact.Using hCG production as the marker, Liu et al, showed that implantation occurred a day earlier in hatchedembryos compared with unhatched controls(9).AH may therefore promote successful implantation in embryoswith defective mechanisms which would otherwise cause late hatching, or in embryos with retarded development by enabling contact with the endometrium earlier and within the implantation window. This isdoubly important when one considers that delayed implantation is been associated with a higher incidence ofmiscarriage.
Whatever the underlying cause, the simple logic of AH is to artificially create a slit or hole through which theblastocyst can escape. This can be achieved mechanically by partial zona dissection, chemically using acidTyrode,s or using Lasers. Hershlag A. et al, (6)published a study of the incidence of MZ twinning after mechanical AH. In A retrospective comparative analysis of hatched versus nonhatched consecutive ARTcycles. The results shown in Table III, that are the pregnancy rate (PR) per embryo transfer (ET) in thehatching group increased from 25.2% to 37.1% and the multiple pregnancy rate from 6.8% to 13.1%. In thenon hatched series there were no MZ twins compared with eight cases in the hatched series (1.2% per ET).
Laura A. Schieve et al,(17)reviewed all the IVF-ET cycles initiated in U.S. clinics in 1996, a total of 35.503cycles and 11.247 pregnancies, and concluded that the risk of MZ twinning was increased considerably when AH was performed. The percentage of pregnancies with multiple fetuses was 41%, and AH did not materially affect the multiple gestation rate. The percentage of pregnancies that contained at least one set of MZ multipleswas 0.20%. However, this rate varied considerably depending on AH status.

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
In the mid eighties, the development of PCR strategies for amplification of specific fragments of DNA fromsingle cells paved the way for PGD of inherited disease from one or more cells biopsied from embryos atpreimplantation stages after IVF. As the human oocyte and embryo are enclosed within the ZP up to theexpanded blastocyst stage any sampling procedure requires micromanipulation to penetrate this glycoproteinlayer. This is followed by removal of target cells with minimal damage to the embryo, a process again requiring micromanipulation.The first PGD cycles were carried out in late 1989 at the Hammersmith Hospital,London, UK, in a series of couples at risk of X-linked disease. The sex of each embryo was identified by biopsying single cells from cleavage stage embryos by PCR amplification of a Y-linked sequence and transferring female embryos which could carry the defect but should not be affected.

Micromanipulation techniques and Multiple Pregnancies
Some authors have linked the use of ovulation induction drugs to MZ twinning (Derom et al.,1987)(11).Others have calculated an increased incidence of MZ twins in the setting of IVF, with or without zona manipulatio(12,13,6,14,15).One well accepted hypothesis to explain the higher incidence of monozygosity suggeststhat manipulation of the zona pellucida encourages inner cell mass herniation during hatching, or that theincrease in twinning is simply due to the presence of more embryos in the uterine cavity after embryo transfer.Regrdless, various rates of MZ twinning after ART with or without micromanipulation are described below. The 1.2% of al MZ twinning after OI observed by Derom et al was significantly higher than the expected frequency of 0.45% after spontaneous ovulation(12).Edwards et al calculated an incidence of MZ twinning afterIVF of 1.33 suggesting that the artificial conditions of in-vitro media are the likely causes of increased incidence of MZ twins(12).Blickstein et al reported on conventional IVF single embryo transfer, finding MZ twins in 5% (4/82) with no cases after ICSI (Blickstein et al., 1999). Alikani et al., reported their results after IVF-ET, describing 6 sets of MZ twins or triplets on incidence of 0.84%, twice the expected frequency. Theauthors proposed that zona manipulation procedures were possible causes of MZ twins.
Slotnick and Ortega, who described an incidence of 3.49%(5/143) MZ twinning seven times over the rate ofspontaneous twinning(18)
.On the other hand, other studies find to contrary for example, Sills et al,(15)reported on 23 sets of MZ twins from 1911 assisted reproduction pregnancies (1.2%), with no correlation between zonal manipulative techniques and MZ twinning., concluding that the most likely cause was the increased number of embryos transferred to theuterus.

Summary

The connection between assisted embryo hatching and MZ twins remains highly speculative,as blastocoeles have never been observed to divide evenly and completely after passing through an artificial zona opening,either in humans or in animal models An analysis of factors affecting zona characteristics is appropriate,since the zona pellucida is central to severaltheories regarding MZ twinning. A synthesis of findings from earlier studies suggests at least three factors are influential in MZ twinning among patients receiving infertility treatments: ovulation induction per se, certain IVF culture conditions, or zona architecture/manipulation. With these three variables occurring together sooften in the construct of modern infertility practice it is not easy to analyze the respective contribution of each,even if multiple regression analysis is used. If the "natural" rate of MZ twins, 0.42%, is considered valid in settings of spontaneous conception and single embryo implantation, then the 3-fold increase in the observed MZ twinning rate reported in IVF patients may be partially explained by the increase number of implantations.
The clinical rarity of MZ twinning challenges the study of this phenomenon in the context of IVF, as relevant investigations require large samples (>10.000 cases) to detect meaningful differences with suitable statistical power. The physiology of both MZ twin evolution and natural blastocyst hatching in the human remain incompletelycharacterized, and what is known has largely been extrapolated from animal models. It may therefore be premature to attempt to MZ twinning and assisted embryo hatching, given the current limited knowledge regarding both phenomena. Although some studies find the part played by AH and ICSI in MZ twinning negligible, the exact roles of these zona treatments remain incompletely defined in the MZ twinning process.Continued large-scale, clinical studies of sufficient statistical power will therefore be needed.
Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynaklar
1. Micromanipulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology. K.Elder, A.Glew, et all. ART laboratories. Guidelines and Accreditation.2001. 
2. Vanderzwalmen P. et al.1996. Human Reprod 11,3,540-547. 
3. Mansour R. The Egyptian IVF centre. ICSI: a state of the art technique. Human Reprod update, 1998, vol 4, No1 pp 43-56
4. Tarlatzis B, et al. Increase in the MZT rate after ICSI and Blastocyst stage embryo transfer. Fertl Steril Vol 77(1) January 2002 pp 196-198.
5. Abusheika N et al. MZT and IVF/ICSI treatment:a report of 11 cases and review of literature. Hum Rpeod update 2000:6:396-3 
6. Hershlag A, et al. MZT associated with mechanical assisted hatching. Fertil Steril 1999;71:144-6 
7. A L E da Costa, et al. MZT and transfer at the blastocyst stage after ICSI. Hum Reprod vol 16. No2 pp 333-336. 2001 8. Cohen J, et al. Implantation enhancement by selective AH using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod 1992;7:685-91. 
9. Liu HC, et al. Fertil Steril 1993. 60,871-875. 
10. Schachter M, et al. MZT after ART: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulation?. Hum Reprod vol 16, No6 pp 1264-1269. 2001 
11. Derom C, et al.Increased MZT rates after ovulation induction. Lancet, I,1236-1238 
12. Edwards RG et al. Identical twins and IVF. J.IVF ET 3 114-117. 1986 
13. Alikani et al. MZT in the human is associated with zona pellucida architecture. Hum Reprod 9,1318-1321. 
14. Blickstein I. Et al.Zygotic splitting after assisted reproduction. N Engl J Med 340, 738-739 
15. Sills ES, et al. Human zona pellucida micromanipulation and MZT frequency after IVF. Hum Reprod 15, 890-895. 
16. Palermo, G.,et al. 1992. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmatic injection of a single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 340, 17-18. 
17. Laura A. Schieve, et al. Does assisted hatching pose a risk for MZ twinning in pregnancies conceived through IVF ?. Fertil Steril Vol 74, No2, August 2000. 
18. Slotnick, RN et al. 1996. Monoamniotic twinning and zona manipulation: a survey of US IVF centres correlating zona manipulation procedures and high-risk twinning frequency. J Assisted Reprod Genet 13,381-385.
Dosya / Açıklama
Figure 1
ICSI procedure
Table 1
Table 2
by the same group,7 shows the early echographic characteristics and pregnancy outcome of the MZ twins.
Table 3
Comparison of nonhatched and hatched IVF cycles.6
Table 4
Relationship between assisted hatching and pregnancy, multiple gestation, and MZ, USA 1996. From L.A. Schieve.6
Table 5
Shows the most recent and relevant publications looking at multiple pregnancies and monozygosity after assisted reproduction cycles with or without micromanipulation techniques. From M.Schachter et al.10